Collusive dominant-strategy truthfulness
نویسندگان
چکیده
We show that collusion and wrong beliefs may cause a dramatic efficiency loss in the Vickrey mechanism for auctioning a single good in limited supply. We thus put forward a new mechanism guaranteeing efficiency in a very adversarial collusion model, where the players can partition themselves into arbitrarily many coalitions, exchange money with each other, and perfectly coordinate their actions. Our mechanism bypasses classic impossibility results (such as those of Green and Laffont, and of Schummer) by providing the players with a richer set of strategies, making it dominant for every coalition C to instruct each of its members to report truthfully not only his own valuation, but also his belonging to C. Our mechanism is coalitionally rational, which implies being individually rational for independent players. JEL classification: C70, D44, D70
منابع مشابه
Surrogate Scoring Rules and a Dominant Truth Serum for Information Elicitation
We study information elicitation without verification (IEWV) and ask the following question: Can we achieve truthfulness in dominant strategy in IEWV? is paper considers two elicitation seings. e first seing is when the mechanism designer has access to a random variable that is a noisy or proxy version of the ground truth, with known biases. e second seing is the standard peer prediction ...
متن کاملAsymptotic Dominant Strategy Truthfulness in Ascending Price Auctions
At the very beginning of the semester, we saw an incredibly powerful tool in mechanism design: the VCG mechanism. You remember: the VCG mechanism lets us find the welfare-optimal solution for any social choice problem, and pair it with payments that makes truthful reporting of one’s preferences a dominant strategy for every player. Pretty impressive! Yet, one-shot direct revelation mechanisms a...
متن کاملResilient Mechanisms For Truly Combinatorial Auctions
Dominant-strategy truthfulness is traditionally considered the best possible solution concept in mechanism design, as it enables one to predict with confidence which strategies independent players will actually choose. Yet, as with any other form of equilibrium, it too can be extremely vulnerable to collusion. The problem of collusion is particularly evident for unrestricted combinatorial aucti...
متن کاملThe Viability of Collusive Arrangements
We consider a collusive arrangement as an agreement by the players of a game to restrict their choices to certain subsets of their strategy sets. A (collusive) scheme is the Cartesian product of such strategy subsets. We require schemes to be closed under sequential rationality. Using this solution concept, we apply the global game approach (Carlsson and van Damme, 1993) to the infinitely repea...
متن کاملA Study on the Collusive Behavior in Book Building Mechanism, Institutional Investors’ Bidding Behavior and IPO Performance
Based on the Chinese IPO book building mechanism as the background, the paper chooses the market-oriented period (from November,2010 to April,2012) of the IPOs as the samples, and studies the relationship between the collusive behavior, institutional investors’ bidding behavior and underwriters’ pricing strategy(as well as the post-IPO performance). The results show that: Firstly, in the case o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- J. Economic Theory
دوره 147 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012